Darwin - Revision history

Paul: 1 revision

2014-05-30T07:59:46Z

1 revision

at 07:59, 30 May 2014

2014-05-30T07:59:46Z

Paul: 1 revision

2014-05-30T07:40:06Z

1 revision

at 07:40, 30 May 2014

2014-05-30T07:40:06Z

Paul: 1 revision

2014-05-30T07:30:24Z

1 revision

at 07:30, 30 May 2014

2014-05-30T07:30:24Z

Paul: 1 revision

2014-05-30T07:30:24Z

1 revision

at 07:30, 30 May 2014

2014-05-30T07:30:23Z

Paul: 1 revision

2014-05-29T14:28:28Z

1 revision

at 14:28, 29 May 2014

2014-05-29T14:28:28Z

@@ Line 22: / Line 22: @@
 {{Fact|8}} "To suppose that the eye with all its inimitable contrivances for adjusting the focus to different distances, for admitting different amounts of light, and for the correction of spherical and chromatic aberration, could have been formed by natural selection, seems, I freely confess, absurd in the highest degree." Written by Charles Darwin, in his book "The Origin of Species", (6th ed. 1872) Senate: London, 1994 reprint, p:143
 ==References==
 <references></references>
   [[Category:Unmasking Evolution]]

@@ Line 1: / Line 1: @@
-=Darwin=
+{{Evolution Says|Darwin believed absolutely that evolution had occurred exactly the way he described it. He was very happy with his own description of the process. }}
-{{9) Darwin, in his original publication, rejected Lamarck's hypothesis of acquired trfavour of natural selection. Later, subsequent research and debate caused him to return to Lamarck's theory. In the sixth edition of his book Darwin abandoned natural selection as the driving force behind evolution.
+==The Facts Are ..... ==
-This was due to the continuing lack of evidence and of theoretical problems. Charles Darwin, "The Origin of Species", (6th ed.) The Modern Library: New York, 1872 p:66
+{{Fact|1}} "You will be greatly disappointed [by the forthcoming book]; it will be grievously too hypothetical.
-{{Fact|10}} "His theory had, in essence, preceded his knowledge - that is, he had hit upon a novel and evocative theory of evolution with limited knowledge at hand to satisfy either himself or others that the theory was true. He could neither accept it himself nor prove it to others. He simply did not know enough concerning the several natural history fields upon which his theory would have to be based." Dr Barry Gale (Science Historian, Darwin College, UK) in his book "Evolution Without Evidence". Quoted in John Lofton's Journal', The Washington Times, February 8, 1984
+It will very likely be of no other service than collocating some facts; though I myself think I see my way approximately on the origin of species. But, alas, how frequent, how almost universal it is in an author to persuade himself of the truth of his own dogmas." A quote of Charles Darwin from a letter to a colleague in 1858
-{{Fact|11}} "Darwin's book - On the Origin of Species - I find quite unsatisfactory: it says nothing about the origin of species; it is written very tentatively, with a special chapter on "Difficulties on Theory"; and it includes a great deal of discussion on why evidence for natural selection does not exist in the fossil record ..... As a scientist, I am not happy with these ideas." Written by H. Lipson (Professor of Physics, University of Manchester, UK) in his letter to the editor "Origin of Species" in New Scientist, 14 May, 1981 p:452
+regarding the concluding chapters of his book "Origin of Species". Quoted in John Lofton's Journal, The Washington Times, February 8, 1984
 ==References==
 <references></references>
   [[Category:Unmasking Evolution]]

@@ Line 1: / Line 1: @@
-{{Evolution Says|Darwin believed absolutely that evolution had occurred exactly the way he described it. He was very happy with his own description of the process. }}
+=Darwin=
-==The Facts Are ..... ==
+{{9) Darwin, in his original publication, rejected Lamarck's hypothesis of acquired trfavour of natural selection. Later, subsequent research and debate caused him to return to Lamarck's theory. In the sixth edition of his book Darwin abandoned natural selection as the driving force behind evolution.
-{{Fact|1}} "You will be greatly disappointed [by the forthcoming book]; it will be grievously too hypothetical.
+This was due to the continuing lack of evidence and of theoretical problems. Charles Darwin, "The Origin of Species", (6th ed.) The Modern Library: New York, 1872 p:66
-It will very likely be of no other service than collocating some facts; though I myself think I see my way approximately on the origin of species. But, alas, how frequent, how almost universal it is in an author to persuade himself of the truth of his own dogmas." A quote of Charles Darwin from a letter to a colleague in 1858
+{{Fact|10}} "His theory had, in essence, preceded his knowledge - that is, he had hit upon a novel and evocative theory of evolution with limited knowledge at hand to satisfy either himself or others that the theory was true. He could neither accept it himself nor prove it to others. He simply did not know enough concerning the several natural history fields upon which his theory would have to be based." Dr Barry Gale (Science Historian, Darwin College, UK) in his book "Evolution Without Evidence". Quoted in John Lofton's Journal', The Washington Times, February 8, 1984
-regarding the concluding chapters of his book "Origin of Species". Quoted in John Lofton's Journal, The Washington Times, February 8, 1984
+{{Fact|11}} "Darwin's book - On the Origin of Species - I find quite unsatisfactory: it says nothing about the origin of species; it is written very tentatively, with a special chapter on "Difficulties on Theory"; and it includes a great deal of discussion on why evidence for natural selection does not exist in the fossil record ..... As a scientist, I am not happy with these ideas." Written by H. Lipson (Professor of Physics, University of Manchester, UK) in his letter to the editor "Origin of Species" in New Scientist, 14 May, 1981 p:452
 ==References==
 <references></references>
   [[Category:Unmasking Evolution]]

@@ Line 24: / Line 24: @@
 ==References==
 <references></references>
-  [[Category:Umasking Evolution]]
+  [[Category:Unmasking Evolution]]

@@ Line 1: / Line 1: @@
-=Darwin=
+{{Evolution Says|Darwin believed absolutely that evolution had occurred exactly the way he described it. He was very happy with his own description of the process. }}
-{{9) Darwin, in his original publication, rejected Lamarck's hypothesis of acquired trfavour of natural selection. Later, subsequent research and debate caused him to return to Lamarck's theory. In the sixth edition of his book Darwin abandoned natural selection as the driving force behind evolution.
+==The Facts Are ..... ==
-This was due to the continuing lack of evidence and of theoretical problems. Charles Darwin, "The Origin of Species", (6th ed.) The Modern Library: New York, 1872 p:66
+{{Fact|1}} "You will be greatly disappointed [by the forthcoming book]; it will be grievously too hypothetical.
-{{Fact|10}} "His theory had, in essence, preceded his knowledge - that is, he had hit upon a novel and evocative theory of evolution with limited knowledge at hand to satisfy either himself or others that the theory was true. He could neither accept it himself nor prove it to others. He simply did not know enough concerning the several natural history fields upon which his theory would have to be based." Dr Barry Gale (Science Historian, Darwin College, UK) in his book "Evolution Without Evidence". Quoted in John Lofton's Journal', The Washington Times, February 8, 1984
+It will very likely be of no other service than collocating some facts; though I myself think I see my way approximately on the origin of species. But, alas, how frequent, how almost universal it is in an author to persuade himself of the truth of his own dogmas." A quote of Charles Darwin from a letter to a colleague in 1858
-{{Fact|11}} "Darwin's book - On the Origin of Species - I find quite unsatisfactory: it says nothing about the origin of species; it is written very tentatively, with a special chapter on "Difficulties on Theory"; and it includes a great deal of discussion on why evidence for natural selection does not exist in the fossil record ..... As a scientist, I am not happy with these ideas." Written by H. Lipson (Professor of Physics, University of Manchester, UK) in his letter to the editor "Origin of Species" in New Scientist, 14 May, 1981 p:452
+regarding the concluding chapters of his book "Origin of Species". Quoted in John Lofton's Journal, The Washington Times, February 8, 1984
 ==References==
 <references></references>
   [[Category:Umasking Evolution]]

← Older revision	Revision as of 07:59, 30 May 2014
(No difference)

← Older revision	Revision as of 07:40, 30 May 2014
(No difference)

← Older revision	Revision as of 07:30, 30 May 2014
(No difference)